Political rants

What? lol Pffffftttt 8P

So I have an issue with polygamy, it's never been a common thing. It's mostly been for very wealthy men or royalty. The average person typically had one spouse. Secondly this whole "the middle east" being some haven of subservient women and picture perfect families is a bunch of myths. It's not that different from here unless it's a very poor struggling country. Plus middle eastern women vary like anyone and there are very tough ones. The issues with marriage these days are mostly socioeconomic. Marriage isn't that good of an investment these days and kids are expensive. This problem affects the whole globe with countries becoming more modern. While I agree the standards for men are tough he's forgetting femcels. They exist and have plenty of dating troubles just like incel guys.

Well from interaction with Femcels they are usually just assholes. They arent like the typical incel and are just bitter and picky. While this isnt all femcels they are the ones we usually stereotype as the crazy cat lady or karens. As for the middle east comment ehhh all i can refer to is my own experience with them. Maybe that differs from yours or whatever. I also know the whole everyone in asia is 10x better than American comment isnt true because i dated a muslim girl from Malaysia and she was a cheater. But i feel the concept holds true that most women typically uphold the common wife model. Maybe it has shifted in this day and age but at one point it was exactly like this. The polygamy thing though is exactly what he refers to. These 1% males are wealthy men. Its comparable to those days where having a concubine was normal. So he was basically saying these wealthy men you are most likely going to have to share. @kuharido

Imagine this.... Now, I know it's like, out of this world, maaaaan... But, hear me out. What if... What if men and women worked together in a relationship to build? What if there was EQUALITY in a relationship? What if they were a team against the world and not "serving out of obligation" anyone? What if they supported each other not out of some sort of "What do I have to gain?" mentality, but I want to see you succeed just as you want to see me succeed so that we can both succeed, together? I know, kind of wacky shit, but ya know, it just might be crazy enough to work. This is coming from someone who clearly understands why (Well, the main reason.) he went through a divorce. Two oxen unequally yoked will find it awfully hard to till the earth, let alone cultivate a lush and life supporting garden. It's all about balance. Of course, that balance is sort of relevant to the society one is in, but that's a different story. Yes, I skipped a lot because I skimmed a lot.

Well you contradict yourself, my friend. You cant have a relationship with nothing to gain and then ask for support. You GAIN the support which has been the message this whole time. You dont get married because there is nothing to gain. You get married for a reason. To further strengthen the bond between you....i guess legally? ^^; maybe i just cant explain what i mean right but this was the message the whole time. Why would a man support you and gain nothing. Not him having someone who lifts him up, not him having someone who is loyal and will improve on his mental health. That is not alot of women in society today. Alot of people are selfish and want what they want but true love is about sacrifice. Willing to make a sacrifice of what you want sometimes for someone else's sake. Such as a mother giving her life for a child, so on and so forth. Maybe my tone is too aggressive and doesnt portray this. When i say submissive i mean in the sense of the traditional housewife who used tobstay at home taking care of kids and whatnot. Some may say this is sexist, but how is it sexist to literally not have to work and take care of your child, cook and clean. Things single mothers have to do anyway but ontop of that needing to work to provide for their family. Maybe you want the guy to do that instead ok fine. But most women wont stand by and allow a stay at home dad and want him to do all that ontop of working. Inequality and those who argue against it are just indoctrinated. Its a simple fact men in society are asked to do more and women are expected to do less. Then when women want to be lazy and get things handed to them and people like me argue against it we are suddenly misogynists.

Where did I say there shouldn't be anything to gain? If you're part of a team, you're fighting for exactly that, gain. Of course there are reasons you get with someone, something they offer AND you offer them. Also, please tell a stay at home mom that staying at home with kids isn't a job and PLEASE make sure to record the interaction/response and PLEASE PLEASE PLEEEEEEEEASE tell them the man isn't expected to equally help out as much even if he is the bread winner.lol Yes, I know that's not what you said, however, that can most certainly be assumed to be insinuated by what you've said. "Alot of people are selfish and want what they want but true love is about sacrifice. Willing to make a sacrifice of what you want sometimes for someone else's sake." Just stop at that point and remember that in your heart, because that much is absolutely correct. Women wanting to work, be equal, be treated with the same dignity and respect of man? That's not lazy. All I personally believe in is equality and that means all across the board. Remember, A LOT of men are dogs and lazy dead beats, too. However, that doesn't mean all men are dogs.

Here is a summary: Panda: women today bad, men under societal pressure Everyone else: sexist, not true, men just as bad as women, women in middle east stereotype, equality.