A Question of Right

Hello I have a little something for everybody here if anybody wishes to partake in it. http://www.philosophyexperiments.com/cat/ Thoughts of said test appreciated.

>Would You Eat Your Cat? I don't really need to fill out a lengthy questionnaire to say that yes I would if I had to in a survival situation. Otherwise no, I wouldn't. Results I got however were; Moralising Quotient: 33% yuk-O-Meter: 50%

Neet, That wasn't the point. I had %33 on the moral quotient and null on the "yuck o meter" part. And, the site is freezing up like crazy... In other words, I'm quite accepting in that I don't go off of social standards, rather, rational standards. Social morality is not always lined up with true morality, but then again, morality is a bit subjective. All you're doing by stating a moral stance, is limiting yourself in "who" you can be. Mind you, limitations aren't always bad, we need laws and rules for society to function. Those who claim to be morally upstanding usually hate mirrors.

Um I'm not taking the test because I'm not god and I don't know right from wrong. I just follow other peoples made up rules.

An interesting test, it's funny as I would have answered differently for a few of these no more then 2 years ago, and 2 years from now I may answer differently again. I got 0%.

A fun test. Moralising Quotient: 0% Yuk-O-Meter: 0%